The NBA legend Tells Court He ‘Wasn’t Afraid’ of Nascar in Legal Battle
The basketball icon, introducing himself formally in a Charlotte court on Friday, stated that his drive to win and novelty within the sport motivated his effort with 23XI Racing to “challenge” Nascar over alleged violations of antitrust rules.
Financial Stakes and a Will to Win
The owner disclosed financial and corporate details of his 23XI team, revealing he invested $40m of his own funds into the Cup Series operation launched with partner Polk and longtime driver Denny Hamlin.
“Someone had to step forward,” Jordan said in the Charlotte courtroom. “I was a new person, I wasn’t afraid. I felt I could challenge Nascar as a whole. From my perspective, the sport required examination from a different view.”
The Core Dispute: Charter Agreements and Contract Pressure
The heart of the case involves the end of a 2016 deal where Nascar provided each team a franchise. The concept is similar to other professional sports with separately owned franchises, such as the NBA’s Hornets or the Carolina Panthers. This deal was set to expire in 2024 when Nascar demanded charter membership renewals.
Jordan testified for about sixty minutes and left the court to pandemonium, with fans and media vying for a view or a photo of the sports legend.
Leading the Legal Charge
23XI Racing is at the forefront of the push along with Front Row Motorsports for Nascar to change a operating model Jordan said is unlawful to maintain excessive control.
At issue for Jordan and Heather Gibbs, who testified before Jordan, are events from September 2024. Gibbs described a hectic and tense period where the racing circuit told teams they must sign a charter agreement extension. The document spanned 112 pages detailing pay for chartered teams and a guaranteed entry in every race.
Choosing Litigation
Jordan said that his team and its ally decided their sole viable path was to decline to sign that extensive document and take the issue to court. The other 13 organizations agreed to the terms.
Jordan and co-owner Denny Hamlin approached Nascar about possible changes or extension options. Nascar refused to engage, according to his testimony.
The Bottom Line: Victory
But in the end, the resistance against what he saw as a unsustainable system was driven by the usual bottom line for Jordan: Success.
“Hamlin persuaded me adding a third car improved our chances to win,” he testified, sharing that he purchased another franchise late in 2024 for $28 million amid the legal dispute. “So I took the plunge.”
Heather Gibbs’ Testimony
Gibbs described her push for indefinite franchises, submitted in a formal letter to Nascar. She testified the timing of the contract signing demand was problematic.
She said, Joe Gibbs first attempted to call and persuade Nascar against demanding signatures, but Nascar’s leader declined the request.
“Don’t do this to us,” Gibbs recounted was the message to Nascar’s leadership. She said France replied, “If I wake up and I have 20 charters, I have 20. If I have 30, I have 30.”